Robotics Category
Robotics Category Event Descriptions
Battle Bots Main Event:
Design Documents must be converted to a PDF file before uploading to the TOT App Submission Portal by 10:00 pm on March 14, 2025.
Common Core Standards and 4-C’s
Prepare for and participate effectively in a range of conversations and collaborations with diverse partners, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own ideas clearly and persuasively. Creativity, Collaboration, Communication, and Critical Thinking.
Design Specifications:
Your robot will need to be able to drive around on a course and attempt to pop your opponent’s balloon while also maneuvering to protect your own balloon. Each team will be allowed to connect TWO THUMBACKS to your robot with either tape or glue. The robot may only include Lego or Vex pieces as well as custom components that have been designed and 3D printed by students to improve their robot. The balloon will be attached to the rearmost part of your robot and must be no more than 6” from the brain (no other pieces may block/cover your balloon). We will be using standard 12” balloons.
Course Layout
The course will consist of an 8’x8’ square marked out on the floor. There will be two bricks on opposite sides of the course to mark the “starting line” of the two competing robots. Each brick will be positioned 12” from the edge and about 45” from each side. See image. The bricks will remain on the course as obstacles during competition. There will also be two bricks placed on the side that have thumbtacks attached to them. Beware of these obstacles.
Technical Requirements
- Vehicles must be constructed entirely with VEX IQ or LEGO pieces AND any student-designed 3D printed components. 3D printed components must be attached with VEX/Lego pieces (not tape/glue).
- TWO standard thumbtacks may be added to the robot with tape/glue.
- Additional weights may NOT be used.
- The balloon will be taped to the rearmost part of the robot and must be no more than 6” from the brain.
- The robot’s wheels must fit on the board behind the starting brick, but other pieces may extend off the board.
- During a round, if ANY of a robot’s wheels are out of bounds the other team wins the round.
- The robots may be controlled with a remote control for the Battle Bot Tournament but must be programmed for the Autonomous Round.
- Students may not touch the robot during each round. If there is a problem with the robot, it may ONLY be fixed in between rounds.
- There will be 1 minute between rounds to make adjustments and reset.
- No firing projectiles or dropping pieces. The robot should attempt to remain in one piece.
- No more than 4 motors may be used.
Autonomous Round:
In addition to the Battle Bot, Tournament teams may choose to compete in a pre-programmed autonomous (NO remote control driving) event for an additional 20 points. This can be completed before the tournament or anytime a team has a break in tournament play. Teams will write code to make their robot do the following:
Points | Autonomous Actions |
5pts | Drive Forward |
5pts | Pop a balloon taped to a brick |
5pts | Drive to a parking area |
5pts | Complete a 360-degree turn |
Battle Bot Tournament Bracket
The tournament will consist of multiple “matches” as teams advance through the bracket. We will try to do a double-elimination bracket, depending on the number of teams that register. The tournament bracket and schedule will be posted online and in the event room. Students MUST be ready when they are up. If a team is not ready to compete within 2 minutes of being called, they will forfeit the match and potentially be eliminated from the competition.
Matches
Each “match” will be the best of three 90 second rounds. Each round will end as soon as a balloon is popped or a robot is out of bounds. A point will be awarded to the first team to pop their opponent’s balloon or push them out of bounds. At the end of three rounds, the team with the most points (2-1, 2-0, or 1-0) will win the match and move on to the next bracket. If no team has scored a point after three rounds, or if there is a 1-1 tie, there will be one final 30-second break, and then sudden death will begin where the first to pop their opponent’s balloon OR push them out of bounds will win the match immediately.
Reward Points
Teams will advance through the tournament bracket in an attempt to make it to the championship round and win the final match. 1st place will receive 50pts and each subsequent rank will receive 3 fewer points than the prior rank (2nd = 47pts, 3rd = 44pts, 4th = 41pts and so on).
Points from Autonomous Round | 20 | See Autonomous Round |
Points from Tournament | 50 | 50 – 3(Your Rank -1) |
Points from Design Document | 30 | See Design Document |
TOTAL POINTS | 100 |
Design Document (Online Portion)
Overview
Students will create a document outlining the process of designing and testing their robot. There will be four main sections: Research, Specifications, Programming, and Testing. The document will be submitted and scored before the tournament and will be worth 30 points. Design Documents must be converted to a PDF file before uploading to the TOT App Submission Portal by 10:00 pm on March 14, 2025.
Research
In this section, students will use the internet or other sources to search for facts and information about Robotics in the Military. They will need to provide specific examples of military robots and cite the sources they used for their research. Finally, they should describe how this research relates to their project.
Specifications
In this section, students will list the dimensions of their robot (length, width, height) as well as a list of the primary components they used (motors and sensors). They will also include at least 3 pictures of their robot.
Control
Students will explain how they controlled their robot to complete the tasks. They should include an image of the controller and describe what each button/joystick is used for. They could also include an image of their brain and list what motors are connected to each port.
Testing
Students will describe the testing of their robot and what modifications they made to improve its speed, maneuverability, and attack. This should include physical changes to the robot such as changing the wheels or redesigning the robot. It should also include changing the setting of the remote-control program. Students should include a data table showing the results of different trials.
Sample Data Table
Trial | Win/Loss? | Modifications |
1 | Win | Original battle bot design. |
2 | Win | Increased the speed of the motors to 90% |
3 | Loss | Used larger wheels on the robot, needed more friction. |
4 | Win | Reset the controls of the program to easier buttons for driving. |
5 | Loss | Redesigned the attack arm but it was too weak. |
If a team does not have another team to scrimmage against, they may simply list their modifications and how they improved/hindered their robot.
Battle Bots Design Document Scoring Rubric
Category | Exemplary | Proficient | Partially Proficient | Incomplete |
---|---|---|---|---|
There are specific examples provided. |
3 or more very relevant examples are provided. |
2-4 relevant examples are provided. |
Only 1 somewhat relevant example is provided. |
There were no examples provided. |
Multiple reliable sources have been referenced or cited in the research. |
3 or more very reliable sources have been referenced or cited in the research. |
2 reliable sources have been referenced or cited in the research. |
Just 1 somewhat reliable source was referenced or cited in the research. |
There were no sources referenced or cited in the research. |
The dimensions and components of the robot are clearly listed with multiple pictures. |
All 3 dimensions (length, width, & height) are listed and there are a minimum of 3 pictures. |
1-3 items are missing, could be missing a dimension, or pictures or both. |
4-5 items are missing, could be missing dimensions or pictures or both. |
There are no dimensions or pictures. |
It is very clear how the robot is controlled. |
It is very clear how the robot works. |
It is somewhat clear how the robot works. |
It is unclear how the robot works. |
There is no explanation at all. |
There was significant testing to improve the speed, maneuverability, and attack of the robot. |
5 or more modifications were very clearly described in the testing. |
3 modifications were clearly described in the testing. |
Fewer than 3 modifications were somewhat described in the testing. |
There were no adjustments or modifications described in the testing. |
A clear and detailed data table was included to show results of the testing. |
The data table was very clear and easy to read with multiple entries and detailed results. |
The data table was clear with but lacked specific detail. |
The data table was confusing and lacked detail. |
There was no data table in the design document. |
Getting Help
Contact Chris Fuge at Chris.Fuge@fresnounified.org or Celeste Avedikian at Celeste.Avedikian@fresnounified.org if you have any further questions regarding this event.